Copper Naphthenate Request

Merichem will provide information at no cost or obligation. Please provide the following information. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

General Information

* First Name:

Middle Name:

* Last Name:

Title:

* Organization:

Division:

* Street Address:

Suite:

* City:

State: Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Federated States of Micronesia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Marshall Islands Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Northern Mariana Islands Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Palau Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Armed Forces AF, CA, EU, ME Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific

* Country:

* Postal Code:

* Business Phone:

Fax:

Email:

*Contact by a sales representative?: Yes No

*How do you prefer to be contacted?: Phone Fax Email Mail

Anticipated application:

Comments:

Date Needed

Month: January February March April May June July August September October November December

Day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Year: 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012

If you would like to submit only the general information above and have an MCRS Naphthenic Acid sales representative contact you, please click here and then select "Submit".

Articles and Abstracts

Regulatory Status of Copper Naphthenate Used as a Wood Preservative

Copper Naphthenate: An Analysis of the Materials Found in the Worldwide Marketplace Using a New Analytical Technique

Copper Naphthenate Treated Southern Pine Pole Stubs in Field Exposure: Part 1—Gradient and Biodeterioration Analysis 12 Years After Treatment

Copper Naphthenate Treated Southern Pine Pole Stubs in Field Exposure: Part 1 - Chemical Characterization of Full Size Pole Stubs 12 Years After Treatment

Serviceability of Copper Naphthenate Treated Poles

Copper Naphthenate Performance: A New Way to Look at Old Data

Comparative Performance of Pentachlorophenol and Copper Naphthenate in a Long Term Field Stake Test

The Performance of Copper Naphthenate

The Performance of Copper Naphthenate Treated Wooden Pole Stubs After 12 Years of Field Exposure

Copper-Boron Groundline Treatment for Poles: An Update on the Efficacy and Performance of a Copper Naphthenate-Borax Preservative Paste

Comparative Performance of Pentachlorohenol and Copper Naphthenate in a Long Term Field Stake Test

Evaluation of the termite resistance of wood pressure treated with copper naphthenate

The biological properties of copper and zinc carboxylates in wood preservation

Laboratory evaluation of the decay resistance of red oak (Quercus rubra) pressure treated with copper naphthenate

Efficacy of water-borne emulsion of copper naphthenate as preservative for northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and soft maple (Acer rubrum)

Copper tolerant fungi: a brief review on their effects and distribution

The Technical Aspects of Copper Naphthenate as a Wood Preserving Chemical

Results of test activity on a water-borne copper naphthenate wood preservation system

Evaluation of wood and soil samples from copper naphthenate -treated utility poles in service

A field study of mobility of supplemental wood pole preservatives in Adirondack wetlands

A report on southern pine utility poles treated with copper naphthenate

Comparison of the performance of several wood preservatives in a tropical environment

Comparison of wood preservatives in stake tests: 1991 progress report

Efficacy of solvent and water-based preservatives for wood. Phase 2

Protection of western red cedar sapwood from decay

Field trials of copper naphthenate-treated wood

Shellrot control in western red cedar: potential replacements for pentachlorophenol spray

Efficacy of alternative preservatives used in dip treatments for wood boxes

The role of water repellents and chemicals in controlling mildew on wood exposed outdoors

Performance of mildewcides in a semitransparent stain wood finish

Performance of Preserved Railway Ties

Wood preservative evaluation by stake tests

34 years of field testing offence posts - results of final inspection

Comparison of wood preservatives in a Mississippi post study

Field and test plot studies of pentachlorophenol stability and its preservative effectiveness in wood treated with liquefied petroleum gas-cosolvent systems and petroleum oil systems

Effectiveness of brush and dip preservative treatments for above-ground exterior exposure of wood

Field Performance of Wood Preservative Systems in Secondary Timber Species

Effects of Copper Naphthenate and Pentachlorophenol on Livestock

Preliminary Assessment of the Relative Toxicity of Copper Naphthenate Acute Studies. Phase 2. May 1984 –June 1986

Preliminary Assessment of the Relative Toxicity of Copper Naphthenate, (Mooney Chemicals), Acute Studies. Phase 3. May 1984–October 1987

Evaluation of wood and soil samples from copper naphthenate-treated utility poles in service

A field study of mobility of supplemental wood pole preservatives in Adirondack wetlands

Preservative treatment of red maple

Diffusion of copper and boron from a groundline wrap formulation through Douglas-fir heartwood

Treatment of Douglas-fir heartwood with copper naphthenate in AWPA P9 type A Solvents

Treatment of Steam-Conditioned Pine Poles with Copper Naphthenate in Hydrocarbon Solvent

34 years of field testing of fence posts - results of final inspection

The Effect of Post-Steaming on Copper Naphthenate—Treated Southern Pine

Security Code:

Enter Code: